Artificial bladder (3 layers of cells on a biodegradable scaffold), and an artificial windpipe
No - this is not what is meant by cloning of human body parts for transplant surgery, although some people distrust scientists enough to believe that this is so!
In fact it is just an experiment to see if cells can be encouraged to grow on a preformed structure. Admittedly the mouse is a rather strange hairless variety, but would you like an ear covered with mouse hair?
In fact body parts cannot be directly cloned and grown. You cannot slice up, say, a kidney and expect it to grow into two or three new ones!
The most promising lines of approach involve encouraging stem cells to differentiate into specific cell types and then encouraging them to colonise 3-D templates so that they can take on the shape that is required. There has been some success with artificial or replacement bladders and windpipes.
Recent advances in 3-D printing offer the chance of building 3-D templates made from various chemical compounds, which may even degrade over time.
It is also worth noting that there have been high-profile failures and scandals with some of these approaches.
See web references below.
There are 5 main areas of transplant activity:
kidney, pancreas, cardiothoracic, liver, cornea.
Transplant supply and demand data
This graph shows the difference between the need for transplant organs and the supply from deceased donors in the UK from 1997-2007.
Some questions about this information
What is the general trend shown by the need for transplant organs over the time period covered?
>gradual increase for the first few years (5248-5673), then more rapid increase recently (up to 7234)
What does the term deceased mean?
> dead - possibly following road traffic accidents or (sudden?) illness
What is the general trend shown by the number of deceased donors over the time period covered?
>very steady (range 738-796) - no real increase or decrease
What is the general relationship between the number of deceased donors and the number of organs transplanted over the time period covered?
>number of transplanted organs is about 2-3 x as many as number of donors
How would you explain this?
>Each donor gives both kidneys and possibly other organs
The gap between the supply of and demand for organs for transplantation has widened from approximately one to two times the (fairly steady) supply figure. There appears to be only a limited likelihood of extra supply from volunteer donors, so it is hoped that some of this shortfall will be made up by material obtained from cloning techniques.
Update -things are looking up!
The eagle-eyed amongst you will spot minor differences between start values here and end values above.
Now what is the general trend shown by the need for transplant organs over the time period covered?
>
continues to increase for the first three years (7224-8012), then decreases steadily (down to 6476)
Now what is the general trend shown by the number of deceased donors over the time period covered?
>
gradual increase (range 793-1354)
How would you explain this trend ?
>
No - it is not that more people are dying [dying to be donors?],
but more people have expressed the wish to donate their organs for transplantation